Richard Lowe writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > Roland Mainz writes: > >> ... the other items include less controversial things - like sticking a > >> "-xtrconst" to all SUNWonbld build tools (and some other places, IMO we > >> should make a list of commands which are run very often and check how > >> the performance can be improved (options include the usage of > >> "-xtrconst", lazyload, I/O via libast etc.)), cleanup some scripts etc. > > > > That sounds quite useful. > > > > I would want more justification than "quite useful" before libasts stdio > bits started being bolted to things.
Sorry; you're right. I was referring to moving strings to constant sections where possible and perhaps investigating command performance. I agree that spreading ksh's private stdio replacement around requires a much more substantial conversation, and I'm mostly opposed to it. (If it's generally useful, then it belongs in libc, not as an outboard motor.) -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
