> 3. What are the reasons for such a "fold" ? Because there's no inherent benefit to keeping them split up and being gratuitously different from every other UNIX variant on the planet, and because sockets are not a bolt-on part of Solaris.
> 4. What about (as alternative propsal OR executed as part of the > "folding") to compile the libnsl/libsocket code with "-xstrconst" + > some further linker magic to reduce size of the data which need to be > duplicated for each process ? Sounds fine. To be clear, there is no project here yet. We're just thinking about it. -- meem _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
