On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:04:27AM -0800, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > I was thinking more of dropping ctfconvert entirely, then letting ld do the > > 'ctfmerge'. > > Yes, but then doesn't the compiler have to generate the CTF in the > first place?
Only if you're insisting on having CTF in the .o files at all. You could moan about the increased disk usage in workspaces from all the DWARF, but I'd much rather have ctfconvert as a private hack to work around that than it be a supported interface. regards john _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
