Joerg Schilling wrote: >> Looks like something in hsfs module is not efficient... > > If you like to run tests, please start with a halfway recent hsfs, e.g.: > > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily/kernel/hsfs/ > > It seems that you have some ideas why hsfs is slow but you did not name them > explicitely. Could you give us more information?
There really is no point in telling people trying to diagnose a problem in the existing ONNV delivered OpenSolaris hsfs module to use your version instead. That doesn't get the bugs or performance problems in the OpenSolaris one fixed. If your version is so much better why aren't *YOU* working on replacing the existing hsfs implementation *in* ONNV with it. Don't expect other people to do that for you. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
