Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I'm not even sure we are still SYSV ABI > compliant. Anyone else know?
AFAICT, with the exception of CIFS ephimeral UIDs, which changed the interpretation of uid_t in an area defined as an implementation detail in one place and hardcoded another way into the SPARC ABI, Solaris10 and Solaris Nevada are still SYSV-ABI compliant. IANASE (I am not a Standards Expert) -John _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
