> An underscore does not separate functionality. An underscore is the implementor's namespace. We should not be promoting interfaces with leading underscores except in extreme circumstances (e.g., significant amounts of existing code would be broken).
> Where do you see a conceptional difference? e.g., I trust you agree that "ioctl(int fd, _FIOSATIME, const struct timeval *)" would look a bit out-of-place on the utimes(2) manpage. That's what I'm referring to. > You could add a futimes()..... Yes. -- meem _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
