Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Where do you see a conceptional difference?
>
> e.g., I trust you agree that "ioctl(int fd, _FIOSATIME, const struct
> timeval *)" would look a bit out-of-place on the utimes(2) manpage.
> That's what I'm referring to.
If you use it where it is typically in use, you opened the file anyway...
It fits the needs. Well it would be nice to have a more orthogonal set
of interfaces that include f*() versions for more features.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
