On Feb 4, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Ignoring any standards issues I'd personally say that both the > OpenAFS and NFS RDMA codebases are partly to blame. "conn" is just > too generic a name for a type/variable. Both codebases IMO should > have used an appropriate prefix on this eg: afs_conn, rdma_conn. > I'm a little surprised that the RDMA code didn't have a prefix on > that given that other types declared in that same header do.
Yeah, that's what we ended up doing - renaming our conn to afs_conn and moving on. /dale _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
