Dale Ghent wrote: > On Feb 4, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> Ignoring any standards issues I'd personally say that both the >> OpenAFS and NFS RDMA codebases are partly to blame. "conn" is just >> too generic a name for a type/variable. Both codebases IMO should >> have used an appropriate prefix on this eg: afs_conn, rdma_conn. >> I'm a little surprised that the RDMA code didn't have a prefix on >> that given that other types declared in that same header do. > > Yeah, that's what we ended up doing - renaming our conn to afs_conn > and moving on.
Please log a bug in defect.opensolaris.org to have the one in rpc_rdma.h updated in a similar way. Thanks. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
