Who closed this bug? This is *not* a duplicate of 6820733. 6820733 is
for brandz and 6820737 is for the Solaris kernel.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Mar 23, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: CR 6820737 Closed, P1 opensolaris/triage-queue Solaris needs
increase number of realtime signals for platform parity
To:


*Synopsis*: Solaris needs increase number of realtime signals for
platform parity

 CR 6820737 changed on Mar 23 2009 by <User 1-5Q-7287>

 === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value =============

 Duplicate Of           6820733
 Evaluation             New Note
 Status                 11-Closed                   1-Dispatched
 SubStatus              Duplicate
 ====================== =========================== ===========================


 *Change Request ID*: 6820737

 *Synopsis*: Solaris needs increase number of realtime signals for
platform parity

  Product: solaris
  Category: opensolaris
  Subcategory: triage-queue
  Type: RFE
  Subtype:
  Status: 11-Closed
  Substatus: Duplicate
  Priority: 1-Very High
  Introduced In Release:
  Introduced In Build:
  Responsible Engineer:
  Keywords: opensolaris

 === *Description* ============================================================
 Category
   opensolaris
 Sub-Category
   triage-queue
 Description
   > ¿¿¿¿¿ ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ writes:
 > > Can I increase the number of POSIX realtime signals? I have a
 > > commercial application running on Linux 386 which refuses to run in a
 > > brandz zone because brandz only supports 8 realtime signals instead of
 > > the 32 required by LSB and supported by Linux 386.
 >
 > If it's demanded by the LSB and is causing problems with an otherwise
 > reasonable Linux application, then I'd suggest filing a bug against
 > brandz -- use bugs.opensolaris.org.
 Linux supports 32-64 realtime signals depending on the architecture,
BSD does 32 or 64 depending on architecture, AIX supports 111 but
*Solaris* supports only 8.
 I propose to increase the number of realtime signals to 64.
 Frequency
   Always
 Regression
   No
 Steps to Reproduce
   --
 Expected Result
   --
 Actual Result
   --
 Error Message(s)
   --
 Test Case
   --
 Workaround
   --
 Additional configuration information
   --

 *** (#1 of 1): 2009-03-23 13:07:17 GMT+00:00 <User 1-F4SZV>


 === *Public Comments* ========================================================

 === *Workaround* =============================================================

 === *Additional Details* =====================================================
        Targeted Release:
        Commit To Fix In Build:
        Fixed In Build:
        Integrated In Build:
        Verified In Build:
  See Also:
  Duplicate of: 6820733
  Hooks:
        Hook1:
        Hook2:
        Hook3:
        Hook4:
        Hook5:
        Hook6: <email address omitted>
  Program Management:
  Root Cause:
  Fix Affects Documentation: No
  Fix Affects Localization: No

 === *History* ================================================================
        Date Submitted: 2009-03-23 13:07:17 GMT+00:00
        Submitted By: <User 1-F4SZV>

        Status Changed    Date Updated                  Updated By
        11-Closed         2009-03-23 13:50:28 GMT+00:00 <User 1-5Q-7287>


 === *Service Request* ========================================================
        Impact: Critical
        Functionality: Primary
        Severity: 1
        Product Name: solaris
        Product Release: solaris_nevada
        Product Build: snv_109
        Operating System: solaris_nevada
        Hardware: x86
        Submitted Date: 2009-03-23 13:07:18 GMT+00:00


 === *Multiple Release (MR) Cluster* - 0 ======================================



-- 
      ,   _                                    _   ,
     { \/`o;====-    Olga Kryzhanovska   -====;o`\/ }
.----'-/`-/     [email protected]   \-`\-'----.
 `'-..-| /     Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer   \ |-..-'`
      /\/\                                     /\/\
      `--`                                      `--`
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to