Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > > I think that might be nasty enough to warrant backing down from 129 ... > > Is it new in 129? The amd64 version of strcpy.s was updated to use SSE > functions in 125, which would seem the most likely place to have introduced > a change. > > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64/gen/strcpy.s
As I did have massive problems with general usability on my Lenovo X61, the last version I did use for a longer time was b 117. It did happen after build 117. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
