Alan Coopersmith wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> I think that might be nasty enough to warrant backing down from 129 ... > > Is it new in 129? The amd64 version of strcpy.s was updated to use SSE > functions in 125, which would seem the most likely place to have introduced > a change. > > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64/gen/strcpy.s >
Wow. Them's some diffs, all right. "Update" might not be the most descriptive word. I'd have to go back two updates to get away from 125 ... I guess if I have gone this far and haven't noticed the silent data corruption this change produces, I'm going to have to cross my fingers and hope for the best. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
