Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Dana H. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Have a look here:

http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/acpica/osl.c#570

What I'm contemplating is adding yet another acpi-user-options bit to
disable access control for those willing to experiment with it.


So you think of making line 646...651 optional by a acpi-user-options bit?

That, and lines 613-620, too.  Read and write accesses are filtered
independently of each other.

Dana
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to