On 7/7/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 09:44, Darren Kenny wrote: > > CVS and SVN were designed with globally spread out developers in mind - > > TW wasn't. I think > > this is what makes them stronger candidates as a code management system > > for OpenSolaris. > they still require developers to either have write access to the main > repository > and put all their files there or make a big mess with creating a new > repository for > local files and merging between them every now and then.
That's not true of svn as far as the write access is concerned. At least if you're using svnserve + fsfs. > please consider the (slightly newer) crop of tools that support really > distributed > work, eg. arch/bazaar, monotone, svk (there are more comprehensive > lists, eg. > http://www.venge.net/monotone/others.html) A few prominent community figures have already noted large scalability problems or other things with some of them. No offense, but of those listed I hope that OpenSolaris would only get involved with monotone or svk. The ideology, politics, and licensing of the others is not something I would prefer to be involved with. +1 to svk -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
