Tao Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for changing the default shell to a better one.
> I personally prefer ksh over bash, mainly because I think it's _technically_
> more efficient to use Esc-k and the traditional vi-key-mode than those
> cursor keys.
This was not true in 1984 when I wrote my bsh and it is even less true today.
What you need is an effective and correct mapper (bsh includes one) and for the
efficience, _only_ the efficience of the _output_ generated by the editor
is relevent. I did test bsh with 300 baud lines and the way it works is even
nice at that low speed.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
