On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > > > > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93. > > > > > > Please take time out and think about what you're suggesting. > > > > Keith -- when Joerg says OpenSolaris here, I think he's actually > > referring to SchilliX. > > Eric, in contrary to many other people he I am trying to be as > correct as possible.
OK. The thing is, the ksh options for OpenSolaris aren't limited strictly to the two you gave, so I assumed that what you meant to say was that you had decided to limit _SchilliX_ to those two options. Eric > > I am using the term OpenSolaris when I am talking about OpenSolaris. > > I am using SchilliX when I am talking about SchilliX and > > I am using Sun Solaris when I am talking about Sun Solaris. > > But it sems that people now understand that things that seem to be no > problem for Sun Solaris may be a big problem for OpenSolaris. > > J?rg > > -- > EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
