Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > in the specific case of ksh88, it may turn out to be the case that pdksh
> > > is "close enough" that the known delta is just a few bug fixes away -- a
> > > small-scale project rather than a major undertaking like rewriting it
> > > from scratch...
> >
> > Why do you believe this?
>
> ksh88 vs ksh93 deltas are described as features or improvements by the
> ksh93 maintainer.
>
> ksh88 vs pdksh deltas are described as bugs by the pdksh maintainer.
Could reply to my question please?
Why do you believe that pdksh makes less problems than ksh93?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
