Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that my own hope is that zfs will become essentially invisible
> > (unlike things like svm and ufs, which need constant looking at),
> > and that the real interest is not in ZFS but the higher level services
> > that you can layer on top of it. (Which, in a sense, argues for the
> > wider scope of a Data and Storage Management community.)
> >
>
> Some thoughts off the top of my head: FAQ, Documentation, Demo tools,
> Future projects, Blogs, etc. Keep in mind that ZFS will most likely be
> the first truly major project to be "released" via OpenSolaris - having
> a place where interested folks can gather, learn, and share, is
> important. The main need is obviously a discussion forum. Regardless
> of how simple the administration model is, people will want to discuss
> the implementation, possible enhancments, bugs, codereviews, benchmarks,
> comparisons to other filessytems, etc.
Will ZFS come with documentation once it is released to Nevada?
I am asking this because it would be essential to include man pages
in distributions like SchilliX.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
