James Carlson wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >typeof(arg1) > > >strchr(const char *, char) > > > > > >or something similar that would carry the actual input over to the return > > >value. > > > > It would soon give you C++ type overloading. Might not be bad, but you > > know where to find C++ :-) > > A good subset of the functionality (which I agree is a bit troublesome > in that generic formulation) would be to allow storage qualifiers > alone (not full types) to leak through functions. Something like: > > #pragma storage_return strchr(1) > char *strchr(const char *, int);
Offtopic: Did anyone thought yet about having namespaces for #pragma stuff ? For example: #pragma vnd.sun::storage_return strchr(1) // for the (vendor) Sun specific statement above #pragma org.openmp::foobar // for OpenMP-specific stuff and so on. Currently all the different #pragma stuff in one flat namespace is a horrible portability issue and people rarely use #ifdef to protect these statements correctly. Is there someone at Sun who's interested to discuss solutions and carry them forth to the ISO-C working group ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org