Joerg Schilling wrote: > Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And there is also the (IMO important issue) that opening "dmake" under a > > "free" license may help other OSes (such as "FreeBSD", "NetBSD", > > "DragonFly" etc.) to adopt it als default "make" version. "gmake" > > I am pretty sure they are not interested because they need their different > make in order to compile their sources.
How different is their "make" version (or better: What are the differences ?) ? > > doesn't have many fans (and lacks "distributed" and "grid" build modes) > > outside Linux (at least in the *BSD variants listed above) and spreading > > the Workshop/Forte/Studio "dmake" may help lowering the porting efforts > > when porting software from those operating systems to Solaris. > > The current problem is that dmake id not very portable. "dmake id" ? Or "dmake is not very portable" (why ?) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
