> Dennis Clarke wrote: >>>Given your blog stories about looking for a job, aren't you the leading >>>example that requiring someone to be gainfully employed to contribute >>>to blastwave doesn't make much sense? >> >> >> Hmmm .. well now you are getting personal. That's okay. >> So no one questioned my identity or intentions. >> I don't think you would either. > > I wasn't questioning anything you've done - I was intending to point out > that despite your employment status you've done a hell of a job with > Blastwave.
Easy .. sell a house and then continue. :-) > The question was what makes it okay for you and not for other > contributors? Ah .. standards get put in place and then enforced at the time that the maintainer joins. However, I have always held my position as "Director" and even "Owner". I also assume liability and own the company name that pays for everything. Despite these short comings Phil and I work together really well and the whole project is a great teamwork environment. > As others have pointed out, the root of the problem is that your current > setup requires you to put your full trust in the maintainers of each package > with no way to verify that they've not inserted a trojan horse into the > build. > That's the discussion that should continue here. That is already underway but in the correct list. -- Dennis Clarke _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
