On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:53:44AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > PB> [really, it should give the patches to openssl.org. but barring that, > PB> it would be nice to see a patch set just posted somewhere, like > PB> opensolaris.org] > > > http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/common/openssl/ > > ?
That's not "patches". That's "the source that sun uses". The blastwave maintainers shouldnt have to deal with diffing out patches; the sun folks should, since they have to do it for themselves anyway :-) > Then Blastwave's OpenSSL is compilled without frame pointers which > makes using DTrace harder... Interesting. This is not a deliberate thing. Apparently, it's just a side-effect of using sun compilers with the -fast option. > And I don't know who's fault it is - the point is that Blastwave is > not always a best choice and some kind of competition won't hurt it. Having user FEEDBACK, helps even more than having "competition". Not once in the [mumble] number of years do I recall seeing a single user reference to, "Hey, your openssl doesnt work well with dtrace because there are no frame pointer refs compiled in" Please email me off-list as to whether the frame pointer issue is on x86, or sparc, or both. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
