On 4/12/06, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why not have /export/zfs_0/ > /export/zfs_0/jumpstart > /export/zfs_0/jumpstart/s10 > /export/zfs_0/jumpstart/s10/SXCRb35 > > all as separate ZFS filesystems, they are cheap after all :-)
It is still a bug which should be fixed. The requirement that only the base of a ZFS file system can be shared is a serious limitation which will hamper or even prevent deployment of ZFS at large sites. Simplified example: Someone may want to set up shares temporarily in a sub directory and the requirement to create an extra ZFS file system for that is a overkill, if not even a risk for production usage (I consider changes in a file system setup as a far higher risk than letting people share their data via NFS). Holger _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
