>swap 14919240 1104 14918136 1% /etc/svc/vol= >atile >swap 15365960 447832 14918128 3% /tmp >swap 14918208 80 14918128 1% /var/run > >What we are seeing here is that df reports different sizes for swap, = >which actually cannot be, can it?
No; it reports "free swap" (well, not really) and the creates the "size" field from "free swap + memory used for this filesystem. >OK, this is a limitation of statvfs. But OTOH shouldn't be the conten= >ts of /tmp, /var/run, etc. accounted in total against swap. I.e. woul= >dn't it make more sense to show the same usage for all those mount po= >ints, which effectively mount the same "device"? Why? It seems that you are suggesting to remove the only useful number from this display, "blocks in use"? Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
