W. Wayne Liauh wrote: >>If this question were asked a year ago, I would have raised my both hands. >>But things have changed a lot. It took me a while to get used to not using >>the Moz suite, but now I don't even install Seamonkey in my Linux partitions. >> >>Second, when we criticize Firefox, we should perhaps also mention the version >>number. The 1.5s are dogs. Firefox 2.0 is now included in 54+. >> >>
Aha, I didn't yet come to upgrading any box to b54. Sounds really interesting what I have heard about it so far (i.e. Studio compilers now included by default ??) However, the fact alone, that FF2.0 may indeed be a quantum leap over FF1.x (which I do appreciate) does not change much in terms of the conceptual design differences between FF(separate apps) <--> SeaMonkey(Monolithic Complete Suite). I understand, that SUNW has to decide and operate economically (in reagards of what should['nt] be included/maintained/shipped). I also see now, that www.opensolaris.org is certainly the wrong place for a total userland project such as SeaMonkey. My personal response is this: For now pkg-get CSWseamonkey. Later this year (Q2/Q3 2007) anyone (users of Solaris 10++ [sparc and x86/64]) will additionally have the alternative to use the then available MRTX packages, including MRTXseamonkey. >>Third, and the most important IMO, Thunderbird/Lightening is now in the >>OpenOffice.org 2.0 roadmap. Unless someone can find a way to also do the >>same arrangement for Seamonkey, this is a temptation--though as great as it >>still sounds--that should be avoided. >> >> >> >>p.s. The SUNWqemu packages are slightly delayed (due >>to a spontanous >>travel), but are in the works. >>Literally and in this minute. >>PLease expect them tomorrow evening or something. >> >> > >Will the accelerator be a part of the SUNWqemu packages? Thanks & Looking >forward to it. > > The existing kqemu wrapper module for i386 and x64 - ported and maintained by Eric Lowe - will continue to work on Nevada hosts (not properly on Solaris 10 / though I'm not sure about U3). So the answer is "yes". _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
