> The fallacy here is in *assuming* that rev 3.2 is > exactly compatible > with your 1.0 usage.
Actually, no, it is not, I just haven't gone in depth here, since this is not the place for it. One of the first things that occurred to me as I started thinking about the issues and this problem is that what you describe might happen; but that is really a discussion for the "installation & packaging" forum, and it also warrants a formal proposal. The crux is at my statement that I have to think about it some more and think it through very carefully so as not to break compatibility, yet provide the features if/when they are needed. I have some clear ideas, but until I'm ready to step forward, I'm holding off on those. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
