Darren J Moffat wrote: > I'm not against this proposal at all and I thought I said that several > times all ready. > > Before I just said "+1" I wanted to understand more about the > architectural direction the project was proposing because it wasn't > clear to me.
My isp's pop3 server currently delays the messages by circa 30 minutes. So I didn't see your "+1" when I sent out my message. > > The reason I raised the issue of SPARC is exactly because of what pcfs > currently does and does not cope with. External USB/Firewire > removable media partitions up with "extended" partitions containing > FAT file systems. > > One of the reasons I'm asking this is so that it I could understand if > the project was covering enough of what I thought was needed to make > it user friendly. Ah, ok. -- Martin Bochnig _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
