Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that would be a bad idea too. I think the only way it could
> work would be for all CDDL code to be dual-licensed. If you allowed
> just CDDL-only code in or just GPLv3-only code in, then you could easily
> find yourself having to pick and choose pieces and then ending up with a
> combination that wouldn't work. It's not practical.
This is why OpenSolaris will not be free enough anymore as Sun is only able to
enforce dual licensing to code contributed to Sun.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
