[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it possible to dual license code with the provision that neither
> license can be ripped off?
>
> We've seen examples of *BSD code taken over and redistributed under
> the GPL, thus preventing the changes from being used by the original
> authors. If we cannot dual license without preventing that, such
> dual licensing would have a strong negative impact.
>
> (That's why I think I will oppose the move as my current understanding
> is that dual licensing allows you to remove one of the licenses)
This is the reason why I am against dual licensing. You cannot enforce this.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
