"James Mansion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think that we ("we" being all of you) should be asking
> >ourselves what we think about GPLv3. What would it
> >mean to the community if we dual-licensed? It's now a
> >possibility that we could attach an "assembly exception"
> >to the GPLv3 which would let us mix GPL and CDDL code.
> >This could open up a world of possibilities.
>
> What benefit would it bring?
>
> Code can't be shared FROM linux with a dual license or an
> exception - or indeed GPLv3.
While you cannot share code, you already may share projects.
As this (although possible) does not happen with Linux, I don't
see any benefit from dual licensing.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
