Eric Boutilier writes: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > > Well, the GNU/UNESCO list has 5300 packages. But I guess you're > > right, there is no reason to exclude packages because they are not > > on the list. How about defining the universe as packages with an > > OSI approved open source license? > > ... > > +1 on OSI-approved being a better boundary than the (rather arbitrary) > GNU/UNESCO list.
We dealt with this issue (ad nauseum) during the ARC review. If you want a different definition, then you'll need to come up with a concise proposal for it, and run a new ARC case that supersedes 2007/047. You should probably work with Stephen Hahn on it, as he was the submitter for the case in question. A big -1 from me for that direction. I think it's far too ill-defined to work, as it walks right into problems with forked projects. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
