John Plocher writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > You've got me. I've pointed out the seeming inconsistency before on > > other threads, but John Plocher seems to think that it's not a > > problem. > > Uhmmm... > > I believe it is Stephen Hahn who is driving this "OS.o isn't a > distro, doesn't do releases and is somehow not connected to Sun's > release processes or definitions" discussion, not me.
Ah, ok. I'd misremembered this thread: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=21240&tstart=120 You clearly said there that you felt that the community needed to run its own release model and that the release points need to be set there rather than by the PAC (as they are today). Sorry about that. > Having Nexenta, Schillix, BeliniX and Solaris distros all based on > a OS.O OS/Netv5.11 release means that ISVs, Blastwaves and other > application providers can all take advantage of a common baseline; > users could choose between the various distros (or, more exactly, > versions of each of the distros) confident that they are all based > on a similar set of OS features. That part seems wobblier to me, especially given the different content in the distributions. I understand the idea, but I'm less clear on how it plays out. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
