chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you like a useful discussion please keep lines <= 79 characters.
> I seem to have not been as clear as I should have. I sugest Nero not because > there is no other alternative but because it is simple better. from and end > user rospective it is highly intuative, can do anything you could posibly > want, has every cd or dvd feature out there, and has a more powerfull (yes > this is true go through the technical documentation if you must) engine then > cdrecord. if we wantt o bring Solaris to the masses we need tools that the > masses can use. if i put nero infront of my grandma (and i have infact done > this) and told where that she could scroll ove rteh buttons and it would tel > her what they wre she could use it (she picked it up in less then 5 min). if > i put cdrecord (even with a decent UI) it would confuse her. Graveman and > others are good but not as good, most of the UI's are still feature > incomplete, while Nero is a full package and all very closely knit. There is xcdroast which is easy to use. If you miss a feature with cdrecord, please go ahead and tell me. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org