> What we > don't want to do is > introduce a three way Fedora/RHEL/CentOS split like > RedHat does. Of > course our > Solaris licensing model avoids the RHEL/CentOS > problem. But we also > don't want > Solaris to become the RHEL of OpenSolaris. You > don't see too many > ISVs saying > they support Fedora (in comparison to RHEL). Again, > our licensing > model helps here, > but this is really an issue for Solaris engineering > more so than for > the OpenSolaris > community. If the OpenSolaris community creates a > production > reference distro, > then it should be relatively easy for Solaris > engineering to align > major Solaris > releases with OpenSolaris releases and avoid the > Fedora/RHEL chasm.
No comments as I am confused. What is wrong with Redhat/Centos? How does the licensing model prevent a Redhat/Centos situation? What is your take on nexenta? What do you mean by 'we do not want Solaris to become the RHEL of OpenSolaris'? Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
