On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:44:13PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote: > > It also would seem to directly counteract any desire to be a binary > > distribution named "OpenSolaris" given it would be under the sole > > control of somebody other than OpenSolaris. > > I agree with you in principle..however.. > > At the end of the day, someone somewhere needs to decide something to make > things move on as effectively as possible. I don't expect Ian to want to or > have > to do this at all. Perhaps this could be a small technical committee instead?
I'm not sure why this is an issue for the OGB. Project governance is generally a matter for the project team to work out internally and in cooperation with the sponsoring Group(s). While fiefdoms and dictatorships are antithetical to the way OpenSolaris has historically been managed, it's up to the Groups to enforce the structures they feel are appropriate. The OGB can only hear an appeal when a dispute arises. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
