On May 31, 2007, at 00:37, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:24:40PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community
groups
for sponsorship consideration - have you sent it to the
Distributions
and Packaging Group? The Constitution and OGB/2007/001 require any
project proposal to come from a Group.
Are we actually following 2007/001 now? I know we approved it, but
Eric's still been creating Projects based on the old guidelines.
I assumed that those projects were proposed before we approved the new
process. Certainly any project being proposed today should not be
using the old process; even without the tweaks we're contemplating to
OGB/2007/001 (which I hope we'll approve at next week's meeting), it's
much better than what we had before and I see no reason not to use it.
Might be worth checking since quite a few projects seem to have gone
through just lately, a cursory glance provides this list of projects
that seem to have been proposed since the Constitution was ratified
and finalised after the new process was approved by the OGB on April
25 (dates are of Eric's confirmation mail):
OpenSolaris Programming Contest in China Academic Developers May 21,
2007 15:24:03 BDT
Virtual Network Machines May 21, 2007
15:20:50 BDT
Emulex Fibre Channel Device Driver May 30, 2007
20:51:34 BDT
Port OpenSolaris to System z May 24, 2007
15:22:24 BDT
Full FMA support for generic x86 machine-check architecture May 14,
2007 19:31:05 BDT
Sensor Abstraction Layer for the Solaris Fault Manager May 1, 2007
02:07:46 BDT
Project Proposal: SAM-QFS April 27, 2007
15:17:17 BDT
Proposal for IPoIB performance project April 27, 2007
15:17:01 BDT
I expect some have followed the process but it's hard to tell in
several places (even assuming I understand it). This seems to be the
first to be bounced.
S.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
