Brandorr wrote: >> so again I ask you - please make a counter proposal. Be part of >> the solution! > > Proposal: No distro will be named OpenSolaris.
I updated the wiki to include this > John's proposal, as I understand, is that only people/teams that can > use the OpenSolaris trademark as a standalone brand, are people/teams > that make a product that only consists of Sun's binaries. My bad - As I noted in previous email (but not on the wiki), the "binary" stuff was trying (poorly) to capture the idea of binary compatibility (if you use the recipe /and/ the packages in the repository referenced by that recipe...) Since the whole recipe/repository thing is causing confusion, I deleted it, and instead added more to the note in parkinglot#1 that we need to define and work on a good definition of 'core'. > (Please note the use of the commas. They can be replaced by the word > "an" if that makes it clearer for you). I did - and updated the wiki to match. > It also seems that many feel that the current definition of > OpenSolaris shouldn't change. That's the problem - there /is/ no current definition of OpenSolaris. There are a dozen or more, and they are all different. This project is trying to fix *that* problem. Please recheck the wiki - I hope I've captured your main concerns. if not, please add inline comments/questions... -John _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org