Brandorr wrote:
>> so again I ask you - please make a counter proposal.  Be part of
>> the solution!
> 
> Proposal: No distro will be named OpenSolaris.

I updated the wiki to include this

> John's proposal, as I understand, is that only people/teams that can
> use the OpenSolaris trademark as a standalone brand, are people/teams
> that make a product that only consists of Sun's binaries.

My bad - As I noted in previous email (but not on the wiki),
the "binary" stuff was trying (poorly) to capture the idea
of binary compatibility (if you use the recipe /and/ the packages
in the repository referenced by that recipe...)

Since the whole recipe/repository thing is causing confusion, I
deleted it, and instead added more to the note in parkinglot#1 that
we need to define and work on a good definition of 'core'.

> (Please note the use of the commas. They can be replaced by the word
> "an" if that makes it clearer for you).

I did - and updated the wiki to match.

> It also seems that many feel that the current definition of
> OpenSolaris shouldn't change. 

That's the problem - there /is/ no current definition of OpenSolaris.
There are a dozen or more, and they are all different.

This project is trying to fix *that* problem.

Please recheck the wiki - I hope I've captured your main concerns.
if not, please add inline comments/questions...

   -John

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to