On Feb 6, 2008 11:08 AM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ultimately, /sbin/sh is an unacceptable shell in a modern environment > > for a variety of reasons. > > > > It isn't even POSIX compliant, and the base system shell should be. > > POSIX does not deal with path names and thus does not require that > /bin/sh is POSIX compliant.
What do path names have to do with the shell command language? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html > Backwards compatibility requiers that /bin/sh remains the Bourne Shell. I don't agree. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
