>"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ultimately, /sbin/sh is an unacceptable shell in a modern environme= >nt >> for a variety of reasons. >> >> It isn't even POSIX compliant, and the base system shell should be. > >POSIX does not deal with path names and thus does not require that >/bin/sh is POSIX compliant. > >Backwards compatibility requiers that /bin/sh remains the Bourne Shel= >l.
But we're free to change root's shell to /bin/ksh93 Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
