Kendall Bennett writes: > The big difference between 4Front and us, is that we have no vested > commercial interest in the project anymore. Hence a dual licensing option > under GPL/BSD type licenses is not something we need to do. We actually have > always done that with our SDK code over the years, in that it was dual > licensed under LGPL and commercial licenses for our commercial licensees. But > since we are no longer selling this code commercially anymore, I really just > want to see the entire blob under a BSD/MIT style license, so both Open > Source and commercial companies alike can utilize all our work.
That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. BSD-type licenses work fine in OpenSolaris; there's no need at all to adopt CDDL. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
