Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:17 PM, "C. Bergström" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alexander R. Eremin wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:06 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi all.. >>>> >>>> Apologies for cross posting this, but for those interested in an >>>> entirely community driven OpenSolaris technology development effort >>>> please feel free to subscribe to: >>>> >>>> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/osunix-dev >>>> >>>> > > > I think I'll chime in - in general I think it is a "Good Thing". > The more activity there is around OpenSolaris, the better. > Trying to keep everything under opensolaris.org umbrella > won't work in the long run, simply because you cannot force > people do it one "blessed" way. > Also there is a concern, I am hearing way too often, that > Sun just cannot let the control go (and I share this concern to > some extent). That is also another reason to have an alternative > way of doing things - to help dismiss that concern. > > So, with that said, Mr. C. Bergström (sorry I do not know your first name) > +1 to your effort. > > By the way, the list info page says - > "The subscribers list is only available to the list administrator." > any reason not to open it to at least subscribers ? > Hi Cyril,
Thanks for your input. I explicitly set that privacy setting because I assume there would be people who prefer to stay anonymous and just watch. I'm forming the introductory letter today and wanted to wait until people had a chance to sub. By all means I don't mind /control/ where it makes sense, but it has to make sense... I think that if we do start a patch acceptance process similar to BSD then in the end anything that needs to be pushed upstream to onnv-gate would be possible with just an OSR request. I'm open to what the majority thinks is a good idea.. Give me a bit and I'll post some thoughts to osunix-dev ./Christopher _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org