On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM, UNIX admin <tripivc...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, of course. Luckily!! >> And I _know_, that most people on this list will >> jointly do this, >> together with you, or you together with them :)) > > Gladly! > >> We talked about this before. But it doesn't make any >> sense to make a >> branch-off from Sun. > > I concur. Right now, it doesn't make sense to do that. But should things > deteriorate, action will be taken. I'm downloading the current snapshot of > the code for archival tonight. > > Sicher ist sicher.
I kept wget running since January 30th (the one operating over www.opensolaris.org still didn't finish yet, maybe it came into an infinite loop). $ ls WGET20090210tue__www.opensolaris.org.log3 WGET20090210tue__www.opensolaris.org.log4 WGET__www.opensolaris.org.log WGET__www.opensolaris.org.log2 WGET__www.opensolaris.org.log3 WGET_cmd.sh alicesuche.aol.de cn.opensolaris.org logfileMon Mar 16 10:07:28 MET 2009.log logfileMon Mar 16 10:08:12 MET 2009.log opensolaris.org www.opensolaris.org $ du -h . [... SNIP] 20K ./alicesuche.aol.de 36K ./opensolaris.org/os/project/nwam/p1spec 37K ./opensolaris.org/os/project/nwam 38K ./opensolaris.org/os/project 39K ./opensolaris.org/os 1.4M ./opensolaris.org 50G . $ cd ../006 $ ls WGET__dlc.sun.com___osol WGET__dlc.sun.com__osol.log5 WGET__dlc.sun.com___osol.log2 dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com WGET__dlc.sun.com___osol.log3 dlc.sun.com WGET__dlc.sun.com___osol.log4 $ df -h . [SNAP ...] 67M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/xfce/downloads 67M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/xfce 145M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfsboot/downloads 145M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfsboot 217M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfscrypto/downloads/20071004 217M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfscrypto/downloads/alpha 217M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfscrypto/downloads/current 651M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfscrypto/downloads 651M ./dlc.sun.com/osol/zfscrypto 149G ./dlc.sun.com/osol 8K ./dlc.sun.com/mc-icons 2K ./dlc.sun.com/global 149G ./dlc.sun.com 7K ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1/osol/opensolaris 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1/osol/indiana/downloads/current 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1/osol/indiana/downloads 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1/osol/indiana 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1/osol 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com/c1 3.2G ./dlc-cdn-rd.sun.com 152G . $ Be aware that I also made local mirror-alike copies of docs.sun.com (with all pdfs) and sunsolve's system handbook. Also opensparc.net of course. Partially this was more problematic than in earlier times, because some access has now been migrated to database, rather than plain files. I did those things to better "feel" and see what is there, locally on my laptop's TB disk. Now it could even become important in another light, as a snapshot of how things were before abc removed or changed xyz? Just in case ... "Sicher ist sicher", I must agree. > I actually believe in the community. There are at least several *former* Sun > engineers that kept working on Solaris code even after they were laid off, > and that tells one a lot about true enthusiasm of the OpenSolaris community, > and is a testament to excellence of Solaris. > > This isn't about Sun any more. OpenSolaris *will* live on, come hell or high > water. > >> Under that new situation it would obviously be >> totally different. > > Agreed. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
