On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Lurie <y...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: >> *** before you argue with moinak, be sure that you >> have taken the time to read his blog. *** > > As you have probably noticed from my messages, I never try to argue with > anyone, I'm merely carrying a discussion in which I express my opinion and I > don't make anyone "clueless", "you must be joking", "ridiculous", and so on, > as apparently some people here like to do, there's a big difference.
I don't make anybody clueless. But everybody who hasn't read Moinak's blog and website and gates _is_ (or makes himself) clueless. That's all I wanted to express. It was a pointer, not an attack. That's why I said "hi" and "regards". Maybe I should have sent this in a private msg. I'm sorry, it wasn't meant as personal attack. SORRY. Also: In my native language the translation for "arguing" is not all that negative. It means "pro-active discussion full of all the _real_ arguments". And since your messages to Moinak contained a number of weak arguments (here we have it again: "argument", not something negative but simply raw facts / and "weak argument" stands for "argument which in reality isn't any, because things are not explained in a logic and verbose manner" The first time I heard the term "weak argument" was when I studied for the GMAT, just for fun, in my spare time, to improve my ability to process data, it was lots of fun, recommended). Also, I cannot know when you joined our community and subscribed to this and other lists. In such a case my default action is, to be "verbose for redundancy". We all don't know us well enough. I hope there will be another summit where we can drink beer and Vodka. :-)) Regards, %martin _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
