I for one agree with Q. The biggest complaints come from the most insignificant people. If LL prioritized development based on the complaints in this mailing list, they would be rewriting SL for Linux using GTK and maintaining a dozen branches for ever popular flavour of unix. But then we'd just be playing a thinly veiled OpenCroquet.
Instead of making accusations and generating pages upon pages of arguments based on hearsay, why not ask a well thought out question that a developer can answer with a simple yes or no? I'd much rather Q and his coworkers spent time developing cool things than entertaining your pointless nerd rage about Mono. On 2/18/2010 12:28 PM, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)<q...@lindenlab.com> > wrote: > >> This makes me sad. >> > There's lots to be sad about. > > I think current Linden Research policies regarding viewer design and > development has severely damaged the trust relationship that should > exist within an open-source developer community. > > That's a much bigger impact on productivity than any personal > complaints about "tone". > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
