-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 oops, it seems i didn't send this to the list, sorry
- -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Thank you for updating the Viewer Directory requirements Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:30:30 -0300 From: Tigro Spottystripes <tigrospottystri...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Tigro Spottystripes <tigrospottystri...@gmail.com> To: Bryon Ruxton <br...@slearth.com> There are plenty of potential bad consequences of sharing your private information on the web, wanting to avoid the spread of your RL info doesn't necessarily mean that you got any criminal activities you wanna hide. On 28/4/2010 20:16, Bryon Ruxton wrote: > Henri, >> So, registering to the directory is clearly not a requirement to be > considered > as TPV-policy compliant, but on the other hand LL suggests that > the viewers > which are not in the directory are "dangerous" ones... > This is both unfair and > very close to pure diffamation. > The viewer is required to comply, just make your viewer comply and don't > register in the directory. If they are to prevent any viewer that does not > comply with the TPV to connect to the grid I am glad for it. > > And I agree with you in substance with your privacy claims, but you have to > live in the real world and you have to abide by California law here. You own > interpretation of French law is irrelevant. Yes LL has a wishy-washy policy > designed not to accept any responsibility for anything. Guess what! So does > Google and every hosting company on the planet, I have the same type of > clauses as a business and doing otherwise would stupid and putting my > company and myself at risk. > > If you are not willing to trust anyone with your basic information, you may > want to start building your own personal datacenter Henri. > You ARE trusting free.fr and Paypal with even more sensitive data btw... > > What should I or anyone trust using your viewer if there is so much to hide > and unwillingness to provide a real name and a simple physical address. > > If I applied your own standards of trust, I am afraid I see no way for me to > even consider using your viewer for my own protection. Just think about it. > > On 4/28/10 2:57 PM, "Henri Beauchamp" <sl...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, I won't take the risk and won't trust > LL >> (or any other company on Internet, even French ones) about being able > to keep >> my data safe from prying eyes... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAkvY4xUACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmUXSgCgi0Irb/W+sv4HJxsBf5/yQtCX SkAAnRszmg6My6oJ40NUCWdh1ZSx7NEc =rqVQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
