Greetings.

I've compiled OpenSSL SNAP 990309-2130 yesterday
on Linux-2.2.1 with pgcc (egcs-1.1.1 with pentium opt.)
Build and install works but I noticed that one
of the tests fails with a certificate failure. I didn't
have time to investigate any further though... maybe tonight.

I also took some time to look into autoconf with friends and
I feel that openssl could really benefit from autoconf rather
than the current setup (it would solve both the const and the
prototype problems with little effort). The only problem
I see with autoconf at the moment is the amount of work required
(learning the tools and setting up the autoconf config files).
But, before going 1.0, would this be a 'nice' thing to do?

One final thought: To ease binary distribution, shouldn't package
building information (SUN pkg info, RPM specs, Debian...)
be included in the source distribution? The building of the different
packages could easily be included in makefile.

Regards,
        Stefan


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to