Ulf Moeller wrote: > > > in fact, I'd prefer ${RANLIB} would be defined at the makefile level, > > which would make the script itself obsolete again. > > I agree. But then the question is what to do with $RANLIB if there is > no ranlib available on the system. I would normally set it to "true". > Is that portable? > I vote +1 -- Niels Poppe - org.net bv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Niels Poppe
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- RE: [PATCH] how to find executab... Niels Poppe
- RE: [PATCH] how to find executables? salzr
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ralf S. Engelschall
- [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Ulf Möller
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL... Ulf Möller