Ulf Moeller wrote:
>
> > in fact, I'd prefer ${RANLIB} would be defined at the makefile level,
> > which would make the script itself obsolete again.
>
> I agree. But then the question is what to do with $RANLIB if there is
> no ranlib available on the system. I would normally set it to "true".
> Is that portable?
>
I vote +1
--
Niels Poppe - org.net bv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Niels Poppe
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ulf Moeller
- RE: [PATCH] how to find executab... Niels Poppe
- RE: [PATCH] how to find executables? salzr
- Re: [PATCH] how to find executables? Ralf S. Engelschall
- [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Ulf M�ller
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Ulf Moeller
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL) Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: [PATCH] $(RANLIB) and $(PERL... Ulf M�ller
