I don't have an opinion on producing LDAP DNs but I think you should use the
v3 form (RFC 2253) rather than the v2 form.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Ridd [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 November 1999 1:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: DN formats
>
> Hi,
>
> The DN string returned from the X509_NAME_oneline function has a
> peculiar and non-standard format. (And undocumented too.)
>
> I have some diffs which will turn it into the RFC 1779 format, as a
> compile time option.
>
> Would they be of any interest? Or should there be a new function which
> returns the RFC format DN?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
