Ben Laurie wrote:
[...]
> > The problem is the liability...
>
> I don't see that that is an inherent problem - though I can see that
> "not-for-profit" might well discourage the investors that would have to
> underwrite the liability, at least at first.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
I was referring to the fact that in many countries (as in Italy) there are
laws about Certificate Service Providers that we do not have time/money
to guarantee...
But I realize now that this is more related to to legally-binding signatures.
C'you,
Massimiliano Pala ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Verisign acquisition of Thawte Erik Aronesty
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Massimiliano Pala
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Ben Laurie
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Massimiliano Pala
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Dennis Glatting
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Massimiliano Pala
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Christian Buysschaert
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Clifford Heath
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Massimiliano Pala
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Erik Aronesty
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Bill Michaelson
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Massimiliano Pala
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Michael Str�der
- Re: Verisign acquisition of Thawte Anonymous remailer
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature