> Looks like a compiler bug; NULL is supposed to be safely castable to any
> pointer type, and compared against any pointer type.
NULL is often a pound define and not a compiler name. Its definition
is very frequently
(char *)0
which is not comparable.
Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2
The Kermit Project * Columbia University
612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025
http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]