> Looks like a compiler bug; NULL is supposed to be safely castable to any
> pointer type, and compared against any pointer type.

NULL is often a pound define and not a compiler name.  Its definition
is very frequently

  (char *)0

which is not comparable.



    Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2
                 The Kermit Project * Columbia University
              612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025
  http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * [EMAIL PROTECTED]


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to